Question of morality lingers yet again by the corridors of the classroom; then in it goes to lecture scholars who have been engulfed by the euphoria of relief from superior knowledge of a person most full of pride by his subject matter. HIPOCRISY was the first word that came for the minds of these students. "Why make us accept and digest such words making it seem that Christianity is most superior compared to other religions and practices?" was only one of the numerous questions these students had in mind.
"Whatever is right is good."
does not necessarily mean:
"Whatever is good is right."
Do ponder and pray tell, is it not true, my ideology? I have considered that we must learn the basics first before we dwell into the depths of Morality. But then, isn't morality relative to whoever sees or views it? Its not exactly contrary to what has been taught.
To be free of this mind-boggling matter, one must first know his/her stance over the subject being discussed and must have sufficient reason as to why he/she believes so. Else, that person is to answer to the professor and surely, the professor would not be happy if the answer is insufficient.
Either way, its almost like asking for a concrete description of reality-- which is actually a chimera.
The remainder of the day had been rather fruitful. I've managed to retain several more information that I should need for the rest of the week but not quite enough to pass me from pop-quizzes.
And that is all for now. Please feel free to comment, it is very much appreciated.
No comments:
Post a Comment